When
trusts are used for legitimate
planning purposes, either
the trust, the trust
beneficiary, or the transferors
to the trust, as appropriate
under the tax laws, are
obligated to pay taxes
on income generated by
the trust property. The
emphasis is someone will
have to pay the tax.
Trusts cannot transform
a taxpayer's personal,
living or educational
expenses into deductible
items. Consequently,
the tax results that
promised by those who
promote abusive trust
arrangements are not
allowable under federal
tax law. Regardless of
the promises made in
promotional materials,
the Internal Revenue
Service noted that several
well-established tax
principles control the
proper tax treatment
of these abusive trust
arrangements. Among these
are:
Substance
and not form controls
taxation
The
U.S. Supreme Court
has consistently stated
that the substance
rather than the form
of the transaction
is controlling for
tax purposes. Under
this doctrine, abusive
trust arrangements
may be viewed as sham
transactions, and,
for federal purposes,
the IRS may ignore
the trust and its transactions.
Accordingly, the income
and assets of the business
trust, the equipment
in the equipment trust,
the residence in the
family residence trust,
and the assets in the
foreign trust would
be treated as belonging
directly to the owner.
Grantors
may be treated as owners
of trusts
The
grantor trust rules
provide that if the
owner of property transferred
to a trust retains
an economic interest
in or control over
the trust, the owner
is regarded for tax
purposes as the owner
of the trust property,
and all transactions
by the trust would
be regarded as transactions
of the owner. Additionally,
a U.S. citizen who
directly or indirectly
transfers property
to a foreign trust
is treated as the owner
of that property if
there is a U.S. beneficiary
of the trust. This
means that expenses
and income of the trust
belong to and have
to be reported by the
owner, and tax deductions
and losses which arise
from transactions between
the owner and the trust
would be ignored.
Taxation
of Non-Grantor Trusts
If
the trust is not a
sham and is not a grantor
trust, the trust is
taxable on its income,
reduced by amounts
distributed to beneficiaries.
Personal
expenses are not deductible
Personal
expenses, such as those
for home maintenance,
education, and personal
travel, are not deductible
unless authorized by
the tax laws. The courts
have consistently held
that nondeductible
personal expenses cannot
be transformed into
deductible expenses
by the use of trusts.
Special
rules apply to foreign
trusts
If
an arrangement involves
a foreign trust, taxpayers
should be aware that
a number of the special
provisions that apply
to foreign trusts with
U.S. grantors or U.S.
beneficiaries, including
several provisions
that were added in
1996. For example,
a U.S. citizen failing
to report a transfer
of property to a foreign
trust or the receipt
of a distribution from
a foreign trust is
subject to a tax penalty
equal to 35 percent
of the value of the
transaction. Other
examples of these provisions
are the application
of U.S. withholding
taxes to payments to
foreign trusts and
the application of
U.S. excise taxes to
transfers of appreciated
property to certain
foreign trusts.
Civil
and/or criminal penalties
may apply. Participants
and promoters of abusive
trust arrangements
may be subject to civil
and/or criminal penalties
in appropriate cases.
If
you would like more
information regarding
asset protection, trusts,
family limited partnerships
or the subject of this
article please call
or email our office.
.